Follow by Email

Thursday, October 15, 2015

Fake "Conservative" Fox News CT "Expert" Arrested for Fraud

Oct. 15, 2015, Note: This article was written in late 2013, more than two years ago. During the course of my vetting Wayne Simmons, I met, spoke with, corresponded with, and shared the results of my vetting with Fox News, other media figures, high-level CIA retirees, the Benghazi group Simmons was closely associated with, and many others. No one was interested in printing this story then.

The "conservative" media has huge problems. Wayne Simmons is a great poster boy for those problems.

Wayne Simmons arrested for fraud.
Simmons with Enablers

Wayne Simmons: Fake CIA Officer
By Kent Clizbe                                                                                  December 5, 2013
I knew it within three minutes of meeting him: Wayne Simmons was a fraud. My friend introduced us because “you’re both former CIA.” Simmons was Fox News’ go-to-guy for commentary on intelligence and counter-terrorism. My friend, a military veteran applying his experience in media and writing, was excited about being associated with Simmons, a “CIA officer.”

Talking to me, Simmons adopted an attitude of brotherhood. He mentioned “his operations against drug cartels,” and going undercover to get drug dealers. He told me, “Yeah, that’s how we have to live our lives,” referring to secrecy and compartmentation.

Real CIA operations officers can immediately categorize a colleague, as in any bureaucracy or highly structured organization. A couple of butt-sniffing questions, and you put the guy in a box: When did you go to the farm? Where were you homebased? Where was your first tour? Did you do the war zone? When did you retire? Were you management? What were your targets? Did you know _____? Takes less than five minutes of conversation to have a clear assessment of your new friend. And it takes the same length of time to determine if your new friend is a fraud. Nothing Simmons talked about rang true. Nothing.

Simmons, who has appeared regularly on Fox News as an expert on intelligence, human intelligence, espionage, terrorism, counter-terrorism, Islamic extremism and other issues, has never been a CIA officer. But he made that claim directly and indirectly, dozens of times in various media—internet, television, radio—in the last ten years.

On his own website, Flashman-like, he described his mythical CIA career: 
He was recruited by the CIA in 1973 while in the U.S. Navy. He became part of an Outside Paramilitary Special Operations Group where he spent 8 of his 27 year career working against Narco Terrorists. Simmons spearheaded Deep Cover Intel Ops against some of the world's most dangerous Drug Cartels from Central and South America and the Middle East. In addition to working against Narco terrorists he ran Special Operations against Arms Smugglers, Counterfeiters, Cyber-terrorists and Industrial and Economic Espionage. His Deep Cover Intelligence Operations helped lead to the seizures of marijuana, cocaine and heroin with a combined value of over $1 Billion Dollars. 

After my first meeting with Simmons in 2010, I began a vetting operation that culminated this week in his admission that he was not a CIA officer, and had never been.

Earlier this week [Dec. 2013], Simmons, in a note to a retired CIA Senior Intelligence Service officer, agreed to “never personally hold myself out as CIA again.He quickly reneged on that promise.

It is sad to see someone fraudulently profit from false claims of experience, connections, and professional expertise. Actual CIA operations officers were denied opportunities to apply their experience and expertise, when Simmons fraudulently pretended to be one of them. And Simmons profited professionally and personally from his ruse.

Since Obama ran for president, I’ve urged conservatives to focus on vetting—both our opponents, and our own candidates. We deserve a higher standard from conservative media. We, rightly, criticize Politically Correct Progressive media for their fraudulent claims and attacks. By featuring a fraud in its commentating line-up, a prominent conservative network let us down. Let’s pop the pimple, admit our mistakes, and move on. I hope that Simmons is able to find his place without false claims. While it may be painful to admit the truth, at least he did. One can only hope he’ll sleep easier now. 

Postscript: This article was never published in 2013 because Simmons, when shown a pre-publication copy for his comments, called all his "conservative" protectors to circle their wagons around him. A host of high-level military and CIA retirees (see the Benghazi Committee roster) made clear that they would broach no criticisms of their fake "covert operator," Simmons. Not one "conservative" media outlet wanted anything to do with breaking this story--in 2013. See the damage done when the truth finally outed in 2015.

Saturday, July 25, 2015

Trump Result: Split Conservatives into New Party?

Donald Trump is exposing the craven cowards in the Republican Party ("the Party formerly known as Conservative"). The fake conservatives hear Trump tell the truth. They whine and moan, and lick the boots of their foreign and special interests. 

How can we get back to a conservative party that puts American interests and Normal-Americans at the core of its beliefs, policies, and actions? 

A Conservative Party would be a good start. 


The Republican Party are Willing Accomplices to the destruction of our country.
Both parties are now wholly owned subsidiaries of AIPAC.

All the fake conservative marketing babble about "Marxists," and "Obama is a Muslim" is distraction from the fundamental perversion of our government to support the interests of a foreign power. See Obama's handlers freeing the Israeli spy, Pollard.

The Chamber of Commerce, Silicon Valley, and Wall Street crony capitalists, allied with prostituted politicians of both parties, pile on to pervert our border security to supply cheap labor and Democrat voters.

Trump is the only one speaking the truth. The cozy alliance between the two parties, each telling their own pack of lies to confuse, manipulate, and distract voters, offers no choice. Republicans and Democrats alike cooperate to destroy Normal-Americans.

Conservative revolt!

Friday, July 10, 2015

Why “Conservatives” Are Doomed

 "Conservatives" are logical, moral thinkers and do-ers. The real world has shown them the error of the hate-America-first belief system of our opponents (PC-Progressivism). But, because of their logical self-interested, independent approach to life, conservatives are hard to lead.

The PC-Progressive masses are malleable heart-followers. They go-along-to-get-along. They do what feels good, what the crowd is doing.

The PC-Progressive Elite Vanguard, on the other hand, is a cynical, heartless, power-hungry clique who understands how to run influence operations---control the transmission belts of culture, the media, education/academia, and Hollywood. And they are masters at the influence arts.

With that understanding and mastery, they use the payloads passed down to them from the original PC-Prog masterminds--America is a racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, imperalist, capitalist hell-hole. And it must be changed.

They use their skills and control of the transmission belts to manipulate the PC-Prog masses for their own purposes.

We can have all the "religious revivals" we want. Without aggressive counter-actions against control of the transmission belts, and their PC-Prog payloads, it's all pissing in the wind.

They're not playing by Marquis de Queensbury rules. They're playing street-fighting, lying, cheating, stealing, back-stabbing, eye-gouging, death-match. Until we realize that, and meet them on their own terms, the "conservative" cause is doomed to fade into the totalitarian hell-hole of the PC-Prog end-game.

Thursday, June 25, 2015

Willing Accomplices--Further Research Coming--Thoughts on PC-Prog Ops Today

 This essay was in response to a reader's comments on my book, Willing Accomplices

Thanks very much for your comprehensive review of Willing Accomplices.
Without going into a point by point commentary, all your suggestions are completely valid.  However, constraints of space and time require massive pruning of any book. Focus and context ended up keeping me out of the literally thousands of branches that I identified that could have been followed in this project. Suffice it to say that I built up material for at least 10 books during the course of this project. 

Specifically, my work on Alexander Gumberg was ground-breaking. No one had ever provided proof and solid anlaysis of his role in the ComIntern's covert influence ops. He was the first covert influence recruiter and handler. I believe that he was the greatest and most influential covert operator of all time. He was the pivot around which the entire 20th century turned. This discovery will eventually result in many books and articles, but I had to focus and keep in context my findings on Gumberg. 

Counts' handler, Nucia Perlmutter Lodge, was another revelation I provided. Her story, too, will be a book some day. Her calm, cool and low-key handling, while living a parallel life of being his secretary, of the egotistical Counts is a case study in professional espionage operations. There is much more to be learned and more stories to be told about Nucia. 

My goal in this book was to research my hypothesis that the PC-Prog belief system was introduced into our culture. My goal was NOT to research every other potential source of the belief system. The unique vulnerability of America's "intelligentsia" who were active in our cultural transmission belts when Muenzenberg began his ops has been covered extensively elsewhere. I provide an extensive bibliography here:

That said, there is NO evidence anywhere that any pre-Soviet-influence-ops American cultural transmission domain harbored the radically anti-traditional-America belief system that Muenzenberg codified and inserted via his ops. Like the introduction of Coca Cola, there were fizzy drinks before, but the influence campaigns run by Coke washed the rest into the gutter of history. So, too did Muenzenberg's influence campaign wash away any other contemporary and similar messages in American culture. 

On the "obviousness" of my candidates for CI review. Well, they may be obvious to you, but no published biography of any of the three candidates reveals what I did, or comes to the conclusions that I did. Any accusations against them, during their lifetimes, were refuted easily and often.
This is the beauty of covert influence agents and operations. And it was the genius of Muenzenberg's "Popular Front" operational plan. The agents were NOT communists. They always had plausible deniability. They always cloaked themselves in various cover organizations and stories--anti-fascist, anti-Nazi, anti-racism, pro-Liberty, pro-Republic, pro-democracy.
What my 3 step vetting process provides is a template for anyone to do historical research on other potential Willing Accomplices. 

The first steps of my vetting of a foreign influence operation today, specifically run by an Islamic power:

As to the need for an anti-PC-Prog influence message, of course you're right. But it is, at this time, literally impossible. Conservatives, for the most part, are incapable of the conspiratorial thinking required to run an influence op. They always ascribe pure motives to their opponents (see McCain in 2008, Romney in 2012, etc, etc). They are unable and/or unwilling to recognize and realize the fundamental mendacity of the PC-Progs' foundational belief system, of their strategies, and of their tactics. 

Willing Accomplices is an attempt to demonstrate to American conservatives that our opponents are not using the Queensbury rulebook in this struggle. Willing Accomplices demonstrates the origins, the foundations, the strategies, the tactics of the PC-Progs. It strips bare the artifice. It shows how the entire PC-Prog edifice is built on a lie--from their assumptions about human nature, to their "for the children" battlecry for every destructive policy they implement. Once the conservative establishment understands the rules our opponents play by, then I can help them with finding potential counter-measures. Until then, McCain and Romney.

On Islamic covert influence--see my article about the PC-Prog indoctrination of the younger Tsarnaev:

Bottom line: extremist Islam has absolutely no chance of sweeping over American society and culture. It's quite unlikely that the kids who are currently doing "freak, grind, and rave" dancing at proms across America will suddenly reject that and begin wearing arbayahs and scrubbing their teeth with sticks. 

On the relative warmth with which PC-Progs greet Muslim extremists in our society, here's the analogy I use: Our traditional culture (the result of 10 centuries of Anglo-Saxon economic, cultural, religious, and governmental development, based on the previous 15 centuries of Greco-Roman economic, cultural, religious, military and governmental development) is abhorrent to PC-Progs. They detest American normal culture. That is the Muenzenberg infection. It has destroyed our cultural immune system. This infection has ravaged our culture non-stop for about 30 years now, since gaining ascendancy in the 80s in the media, academia and Hollywood. We are like an AIDS patient--living, but without an immune system. That creates a perfect breeding ground for opportunistic infections. Apparent support for Islamists is just that--an opportunistic infection. PC-Progs have no interest in living under Sharia, or in a Caliphate. But Islamists have the strongest, most dedicated cadre of believers (how many Occupy Wall Streeters think that their anti-capitalist-America activities will guarantee them a place in heaven?!). So they are the most visible and the most aggressive and "successful" anti-normal-America operators today.

What may look like an influence op is simply PC-Progs embracing the enemy of their enemy. Like Stalin and Zinoviev, once the mutual enemy is destroyed, the erstwhile ally will be crushed too. Or so they think. Could be that the ex-ally will destroy the gutted shell of what's left of American culture. Who knows?

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

Politically Correct Progressive Belief System

The PC-Progressive Party (which uses the cover title "Democrat Party") has an iron-clad list of beliefs. In order to be a member, one must subscribe to this belief system. One hundred percent. At least in public. Toe the Party line. Politically Correct--that's what it means.

Here is a short list of the required elements of the PC-Prog (Democrat) belief system:

1. Normal-America is irredeemably racist. Blacks and other minorities live a life of constant harassment and hopeless repression by Normal-Americans.

2. Normal-America is virulently sexist. Women live lives of desperate hopelessness. They are forced by the patriarchy to accept social and professional roles that demean and diminish them. Normal-Americans aggressively try to restrict women's rights to kill fetuses.

3. Normal-America is homophobic. Christian haters thump Bibles in their quest to locate, persecute, prosecute and lynch fun-loving homosexuals, lesbians, transsexuals, and bi-sexuals.

4. Normal-America is stunningly xenophobic. Normal-Americans loathe foreigners. Normal-American society rejects all foreigners and views them as vile, dirty, stinking beasts with unintelligible accents.

5. Normal-America is graspingly imperialist. Normal-Americans seek to conquer, destroy and subjugate peace-loving native cultures in Africa, the Middle East, South America and Asia. America is built on a legacy of imperialist destruction of Native American and Hispanic cultures.
6. Normal-America is greedily capitalist. The American economy destroys poor people with angry demands that they must work. The economy is systematically manipulated by the 1% in order to 
subjugate the 99%. Capitalism rewards only the lucky few, while the masses suffer. 

The American economy is boiling Gaia's atmosphere--causing horrible things to happen.
These tenets are the core of the PC-Prog politics. The beliefs are nearly religious. To be a member, one must never contradict these tenets (in public, or in privately recorded conversations.)

The corollary to the tenets of PC-Progressivism is the "Action Requirement."

This is it. That is the entire belief system, and the action plan of our political opponents.

Without understanding what it is that their system believes and requires, we have no hope of count-acting their destruction of our country. Now you know. What will you do about it?

See this short video for details:

Thursday, January 8, 2015

Mother Nature's Experiment with CO2--Will raised CO2 level increase temperature?

"Climate sensitivity" claims are based on models not observation. There is no empirical data showing CO2 acting as a GHG.

In fact, there is a fantastic physical observation that totally debunks the “CO2 is a GHG” fallacy.
It’s just lying there waiting for a grad student to seize hold of and destroy the AGW hypothesis once and for all.
What is it? 
The massive CO2 emissions from certain volcanoes, like Mt Nyos in Africa, provides real-world events that provide data on the “heat-trapping” effects of high concentrations of CO2. But apparently no scientist has seen the connection between the theory and the physical data available for them to use to test the theory. 
The theoretical basis of AGW is: “Increasing concentrations of atmospheric CO2 will increase surface temperatures.” 
An ideal experimental design to test that hypothesis would have scientists injecting massive amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere and then monitoring local temperatures. Evidently no scientist has been able to conduct such an experiment. Instead we have amateurish propagandic showcases like Bill Nye’s jar full of CO2 “experiment.” 
Mother Nature helpfully implemented the experimental design: 
“On August 21, 1986, possibly as the result of a landslide, Lake Nyos suddenly emitted a large cloud of CO2, which suffocated 1,700 people and 3,500 livestock in nearby towns and villages…
“Carbon dioxide, being about 1.5 times as dense as air, caused the cloud to “hug” the ground and descend down the valleys, where various villages were located. The mass was about 50 metres (160 ft) thick and it travelled downward at a rate of 20–50 kilometres per hour (12–31 mph). For roughly 23 kilometres (14 mi) the cloud remained condensed and dangerous, suffocating many of the people sleeping in Nyos, Kam, Cha, and Subum.[4] About 4,000 inhabitants fled the area, and many of these developed respiratory problems, lesions, and paralysis as a result of the gases…”
So, in Mother Nature’s experiment, she created a 160 foot thick, 14 mile long atmospheric concentration of CO2. 
The research that needs to be done would involve collecting temperature readings from before, during, and after the CO2 cloud covering the area. 

The AGW hypothesis would be: In the areas subjected to the experimental increases in concentrations of CO2, temperatures will increase following the IPCC’s “sensitivity formula” for CO2’s effects on surface temperature. 
The experiment has been conducted. Someone just needs to collect the data. Fame, fortune, and the survival of the free world await.

Friday, January 2, 2015

Does America Need a Common Core of Cultural Literacy as a National Curriculum?

Conservative" blabberers have totally skewed reality on this issue.

The "conservative" Rage Against Common Core is being fanned by special interests.

The problem is NOT a "Common Core" for American children to be introduced to, learn, and appreciate American culture and learn basic skills (reading, writing and arithmetic). We MUST have a Common Core that propagates American culture through the generations.

The problem IS the content of the Common Core, while the Education Establishment is controlled by anti-American Politically Correct Progressives.

We had a Common Core for many generations of American students. One of the best examples of this American Common Core is the McGuffey Readers:

"The McGuffey Readers reflect their author's personal philosophies, as well as his rough and tumble early years as a frontier schoolteacher. The finished works represented far more than a group of textbooks; they helped frame the country's morals and tastes, and shaped the American character. The lessons in the Readers encouraged standards of morality and society throughout the United States for more than a century. They dealt with the natural curiosity of children; emphasized work and an independent spirit; encouraged an allegiance to country, and an understanding of the importance of religious values. The Readers were filled with stories of strength, character, goodness and truth. The books presented a variety of contrasting viewpoints on many issues and topics, and drew moral conclusions about lying. "

There is a newer version of the American Common Core, introduced in the 80s and 90s, E.D. Hirsch's series provides a clear curriculum for American Cultural Literacy. The titles of the series were: What your ____ Grader Needs to Know.

Every American school SHOULD use the Hirsch Common Core of Cultural Literacy to educate American kids.

When you talk to my kids (not to blow my own horn), you'll find that they can carry on a conversation about any issue from American/world history/culture/politics. This is because they were raised on the American Common Core. It was introduced to them as "fun" reading and activities outside their school work.

If American schools used the Hirsch Common Core as the standard, there would be a flowering of American culture and a renaissance of America.

It's only possible with a Common Core--one that celebrates America's greatness. The problem is that today's Education Mafia's Common Core tends to DENIGRATE American greatness.