Share It

Obliterating Exceptionalism

Follow by Email

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

491e280e5c6a550501337c1fd54104cb907d0561c9ac1aa6a2

Wednesday, July 2, 2014

Politically Correct Progressive Belief System

The PC-Progressive Party (which uses the cover title "Democrat Party") has an iron-clad list of beliefs. In order to be a member, one must subscribe to this belief system. One hundred percent. At least in public. Toe the Party line. Politically Correct--that's what it means.

Here is a short list of the required elements of the PC-Prog (Democrat) belief system:

1. Normal-America is irredeemably racist. Blacks and other minorities live a life of constant harassment and hopeless repression by Normal-Americans.

2. Normal-America is virulently sexist. Women live lives of desperate hopelessness. They are forced by the patriarchy to accept social and professional roles that demean and diminish them. Normal-Americans aggressively try to restrict women's rights to kill fetuses.

3. Normal-America is homophobic. Christian haters thump Bibles in their quest to locate, persecute, prosecute and lynch fun-loving homosexuals, lesbians, transsexuals, and bi-sexuals.

4. Normal-America is stunningly xenophobic. Normal-Americans loathe foreigners. Normal-American society rejects all foreigners and views them as vile, dirty, stinking beasts with unintelligible accents.

5. Normal-America is graspingly imperialist. Normal-Americans seek to conquer, destroy and subjugate peace-loving native cultures in Africa, the Middle East, South America and Asia. America is built on a legacy of imperialist destruction of Native American and Hispanic cultures.

6. Normal-America is greedily capitalist. The American economy destroys poor people with angry demands that they must work. The economy is systematically manipulated by the 1% in order to subjugate the 99%. Capitalism rewards only the lucky few, while the masses suffer.

These tenets are the core of the PC-Prog politics. The beliefs are nearly religious. To be a member, one must never contradict these tenets (in public, or in privately recorded conversations.)

The corollary to the tenets of PC-Progressivism is the "Action Requirement."

It is simple: Normal-America must be changed.

This is it. That is the entire belief system, and the action plan of our political opponents.

Without understanding what it is that their system believes and requires, we have no hope of count-acting their destruction of our country. Now you know. What will you do about it?

See this short video for details:

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

Crimean War 2--Thanks to Soros/Nuland/Sunstein/Power/Brennan and Obama's Handlers

For all those blinded by their own Cold War fantasies--you might wanna bone up on the history of the region where Obama's handlers and Soros are dragging us into a war.

Master manipulator Soros--"Ve haff vays of controlling your currency."




The First Crimean War (as it will surely be called, once the neo-con/PC-Prog war machine gets things cooking soon) was, just as this one is, purely about European intranecine power struggles.

Specifically, it was about today's EU (France, UK) grabbing for power and influence at the expense of the Turkish Ottoman Empire (Sharia! Run away!) and the Russian Empire.

Glorious War! Stop that grasping Russian Empire! Charge!




Why the hell wasn't President James Buchanan cracking down on those nasty__________ (fill in the blank for your preferred minute-of-hate religion/nationality/empire)! American prestige was at stake! There was as much American interest at stake in 1856 Crimea as there is in 2014 Crimea.

James Buchanan, Focused on American Interests




"War sparked by what on first glance appears to be a trivial disagreement over the Christian shrines of Jerusalem, but that was actually the result of long term European tensions. Russia had long been expanding south at the expense of various Muslim states, and the Ottoman Turks, slowly gaining ground, while the ever weaking Ottoman empire still controlled large areas of the Balkans. The Russians were the guardians of the Christian shrines within the Ottoman Empire, and when a dispute broke out between Orthodox and Catholic Christians in Jerusalem, France decided to intervene as protector of the Catholics, gaining special status from the Turks in 1852.

"Tsar Nicholas I of Russia decided to use the tension in an attempt to gain control of Constantinople and with it direct access to the Mediterranean. This alarmed France, long term allies of Turkey, and enemies of Russia, and Britain, who objected to any change in the balance of power, and also had rivalries with Russia further east. Russia issued demands in May 1853, which were soon refused, and Russian troops began to occupy Turkish Moldavia and parts of Rumania in July. The Turks declared war on Russia in October, and a Turkish army crossed the Danube, defeating the Russians at the battle of Oltenitza (4 November 1853), in southern Rumania.

"On 30 November the Russians defeated a Turkish fleet at Sinope, in an encounter most significant for the introduction of shell guns by the Russians, although their control of the Black Sea was short lived, and a Franco-British fleet entered the Black Sea in January 1854. On 28 March 1854, Britain and France declared war on Russia, and moved to help the Turks."

http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/wars_crimean.html

Saturday, March 22, 2014

PC-Progs Play Conservatives like Big Fiddles--Look a Distraction--Hitler!

It appears that many conservatives don't understand they're being played like a fiddle! The PC-Progs in the administration, and their neo-con partners in mayhem are relying on guys like you--until a month ago focused on impeaching the President, Benghazi, IRS, Obamacare, and the myriad other destructive actions of Obama's handlers.

 


All they had to do to distract many stalwart, honest conservatives, is to start running covert actions--both in Ukraine, and in US media. Their sole goal is to distract their domestic opponents--wave bloody shirts, scream Stalin! and Hitler! and Poland!


These calls create reactions of great and praiseworthy patriotism from conservatives--but totally misplaced--in time and in target.

Our PC-Prog administration is not carrying out foreign policy in the best interests of America. They have other, unclear objectives. But, if you understand them, their main objective is purely domestic. They intend to utterly destroy us, and everything we stand for. Their foreign policies are simply projections of their domestic policy.

They've succeeded in distracting many of us. Shouldn't that be enough of a clue that their actions are not for American interests?

I called the whole Hillary-driven State Dept cabal the "estrogen-drunk war-mongers" back when they ginned up Mubarack's downfall, and destroyed Libya.
The excerpt from an article by Finian Cunningham lays out this cabal's weird, PC-Prog, heartless, meanness clear as a bell.

Are these our allies? Their incompetence, arrogance, ignorance, makes a mockery of good conservatives who've served American our entire lives. These women are pretend covert operators, playing with real countries and real lives. Death and destruction follow in their wake.

"Washington's Cloned Female Warmongers

By Finian Cunningham

"February 09, 2014 "Information Clearing House - What is it about America's women diplomats? They seem so hard and cloned - bereft of any humanity or intelligence. Presumably, these women are supposed to represent social advance for the female gender. But, far from displaying female independence, they are just a pathetic copy of the worst traits in American male politicians - aggressive, arrogant and completely arrant in their views.

"Take Victoria Nuland - the US Assistant Secretary of State - who was caught using obscene language in a phone call about the European Union and the political affairs of Ukraine. In her previous posting as a spokeswoman for the US State Department, Nuland had the demeanor of a robotic matron with a swivel eye.

"Now in her new role of covertly rallying anti-government protesters in Ukraine, Nuland has emerged to sound like a bubblegum-chewing Mafia doll. In her leaked private conversation with the US ambassador to Kiev, the American female diplomat is heard laying down in imperious tones how a new government in Ukraine should be constituted. Nuland talks about "gluing together" a sovereign country as if it is a mere plaything, and she stipulates which members of the US-backed street rabble in Kiev should or should not be included in any Washington-approved new government in the former Soviet republic."

"We don't know who actually tapped and leaked Nuland's private call to the US ambassador in Kiev, Geoffrey Pyatt. It could have been the Ukrainian or Russian secret services, but, regardless, it was an inspired move to reveal it. For the disclosure, which has been posted on the internet, lays bare the subversive meddling agenda of Washington in Ukrainian internal affairs. Up to now, the Americans have been piously pretending that their involvement is one of a bystander supporting democracy from afar.

"But, thanks to the Nuland's foul-mouthed indiscretion, the truth is out. Washington, from her own admission, is acting like an agent provocateur in Ukraine's political turmoil. That is an illegal breach of international rules of sovereignty. Nuland finishes her phone call like a gangster ordering a hit on a rival, referring to incompetent European interference in Ukraine with disdain - "F...k the EU."

"What we are witnessing here is the real, ugly face of American government and its uncouth contempt for international law and norms.

Friday, March 21, 2014

Unholy Alliance of Neo-cons and PC-Progressives Racing Towards War--Why?

The neo-conservatives, banging their constant calls for war--anywhere, any time--and the PC-Progs--who are really pissed at Putin for the whole anti-homosexual issue--are ready to take on Russia.



Let 'em! Go build a unified neo-con/LGBT/IMF/EU Army. But don't drag America, and America's military into your tangled webs of intrigue and conflict.


There are NO American interests at stake in Crimea. None. Not one.

This is not 1959, nor is it 1979. The Soviet Union is gone. The Russians have regional interests. They are bumping up against the EU's interests. Let those two hash it out.

The PC-Progs, led by the despicable Samantha Power, Victoria Nuland, and the rest of the estrogen-drunk cabal at the State Department love them some war.



It's time to put a stop to their abuse of American prestige and power.

No to PC-Prog/Neo-Con meddling! 

Here's the PC-Prog "humanitarian" warrior princess, (wow, so tough, just listen to that redhead fan the war flames! My little heart's all atwitter!), Sammy Power, in the UN Security Council:

"Russia is known for its literary greatness – and what you just heard from
the Russian Ambassador showed more imagination than Tolstoy or Chekhov. Russia has decided, it seems, to rewrite its borders, but it cannot rewrite the facts.

"Now, the referendum has taken place, but the national and international legal status of Crimea has not changed. A thief can steal property, but that does not confer the right of ownership on the thief."

"...let me just emphasize again what Russia has done is wrong as a matter of law, wrong as a matter of history, wrong as a matter of policy, and dangerous. What happened in Crimea cannot be recognized as valid. We must stand together denying recognition and imposing consequences for this illegal act. In doing so, we must also be very clear that what happened in Crimea cannot be repeated in other parts of Ukraine."

Those are insults designed to prod a normal man into reaction.

Passive aggressive PC-Prog humanitarian war lovers.

Many wars have been launched for much less hysterical ravings.

Note that Power and her clique are ginning up a good "humanitarian" justification now--the Tatars in Crimea.



The PC-Prog regime are NOT "wimps," at least not in the sense that you're characterizing them--unwilling to kill, destroy, or mutilate. Obama's handlers have him sign death warrants daily. He gladly sends American troops to their death, without a second's hesitation. Obama peruses the "death lists" every night, annotating and condemning those whom he believes worthy of death.

He and his cronies launched a war against Libya, resulting in thousands, maybe tens of thousands of deaths. His handlers boldly provide funding, arms and training to Al-Qaeda-linked jihadists--in Egypt, Libya, and Syria.

Obama and his handlers sent a team of American SEALS to seize a ship full of Libyan Islamic Jihad oil that belonged to EU oil companies, and had been stolen by another Libyan Islamic group for sale to other EU entities. No US interests at all. Just boldly sending American soldiers to potentially die for EU/Libyan Islamic oil.

That's pretty doggone ballsy stuff there.

But it is all COVERT. The PC-Progs are manipulating the neo-cons, and their own ignorant followers. By relying on COVERT warfare, they never have to admit publicly what they are doing. The neo-cons see it, and love it--that's why McCain and Graham just love Obama and his clique. The PC-Prog true believers have no clue--whatever Obama reads off the teleprompter is from a savior.

And the main point of all these foreign adventuring is that the real issues--Obama's misadventures here at home, are all forgotten.

Look at how effective that is. Conservatives who regularly demonstrate on the streets of their town, urging a movement for Impeaching Obama. And yet, many of them are now tied up in knots, defending Obama's meddling in foreign issues with no American interests at stake.



There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding of our opponents. They are experts at influence, covert manipulation, lying, misdirection, and deceit--and they now own the entire apparatus of the American intelligence community--purged of virtually all dissidents. Combined with their massive domestic campaign/PR machine, and control of the media, they are cooking conservatives gooses, and many conservatives urge them to cook harder.

Who cares (in America) what Putin snatches? What effect does Crimea now being Russian have on us? Now if Mexico was snatching Arizona, that would be an American interest. There is NO American interest in Crimea. Not like the good old days.


Sunday, March 16, 2014

Neo-conservatives Bang the Drums for Obama's Handlers' War in Crimea

Neo-conservatives babble about the importance of "keeping our commitments" to the EU and Ukraine. As if the America run by Obama's handlers was the real America. Neo-cons' excuses for supporting the IMF/EU's war against Russia include enforcing respect for territorial integrity. They rationalize also that America must maintain our credibility.

Neo-con/Obama/Brennnan's Democratic "Freedom fighters" on the Euro-Maidan

Territorial integrity? Commitments? Credibility?

Is that a joke? Obama's handlers and the Clintons let those horses out of the barn long ago.

How about the territorial integrity of Serbia--remember Kosovo? The Serbs and Russians do!

How about the territorial integrity of Libya?

Territorial integrity of Egypt? Territorial integrity of Syria? Territorial integrity of Pakistan? Obama's handlers have violated all of the above. The rest of the world watches our anti-Traditional administration. They see, just as we do domestically, the lawless sabotage of other nations' sovereignty by Obama's handlers.

Commitments? The whole world sees Obama's handlers lie repeatedly--about everything they do, foreign and domestic. All of them know that there is no commitment Obama's America makes that is worth the paper it's written on. The Obama/Holder/Kerry/Brennan regime is all about lacking credibility.

The rest of the world saw the Obama/Brennan covert take-down of Libya as craven groveling to the EU's economic interests. And all of Obama's America's actions are the same. None are taken in American interests. And the world sees that, and knows that.

There is no respect for America in the world already. We sure as hell don't need to get in a war designed to bolster the PC-Progs' domestic agenda to build respect.

If we're gonna get involved in Crimea, why not start a war in Kashmir? Why not start a war in Tibet? Why not Xinjiang? Why not start a war with China over Japan's islands? Or the disputed territory in the South China Sea?

There are no American interests at stake in Ukraine--except for the interests of the PC-Prog Obama clique worried about their grip on American society. Notice how Obamacare has slipped off the front pages? Benghazi is a distant memory. What Fast and Furious--all gone from the news now? IRS persecution of the Tea Party--pleading the Fifth to conceal Obama's handler's role directing the persecution. All gone now.

A war is exactly what the PC-Progs need. Don't give it to them.

Wednesday, May 29, 2013


Purges, Dissidents and the Progressive Regime—Something’s Gotta Give

 

By Kent Clizbe                                                                                 May 16, 2013

The Obama/Hillary/Holder regime’s arrogant fa├žade is slowly crumbling. The president and his cabal of handlers have somehow gone a step too far. There is no accounting for why the media and some other of the Chicago gang’s public enablers are seemingly turning on 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. But indeed they are. Maybe the revelations of the Associated Press (AP) having its communications sucked into the maw of the political targeters let slip the mask of the “fun-to-hang-out-with-dude” fronting the regime. The revelation that the “dude” is instead a punk may have shocked those Politically Correct Progressives who empowered the dude and his handlers.

The pure power the gang commands is unprecedented in American history. An astute student of American politics, influence, scandals, and misdeeds would be hard pressed to find a more stunning abuse of power than what has been revealed of the Obama clique’s misdeeds to date. And I use “to date” purposefully. It is very likely that there remain many more shoes to drop as we learn specifics of this regime’s corrupt political hounding of its “enemies.”

Intimidation and veiled threats are powerful when wielded by investigators with the power to take your livelihood, your reputation, your freedom, or your life. I first wrote about what I called the Obama/Holder Global War on the CIA, in August of 2009 (in Newsmax), when the uniquely unqualified Leon Panetta was the Director of the CIA. In the next two years, I wrote several more articles about the politicization of the CIA and the war on terror. The main target of my analysis was the unctuous John Brennan, at the time Obama’s toady “Terrorism Czar.”

In February, 2011, I wrote a BigPeace article titled Cairo Meddler--Czar Brennan Needs to Go.  This massive cluster-failure of a foreign policy looks like an amateur operation, run by a wannabe operator. The one personality in the Obama administration that fits that description is John Brennan.

“Egypt today is no place for a ‘semester abroad expert’ political analyst to be allowed free rein. Obama, fire John Brennan today. Let the DNI that you and your party craved do his work. You have a huge intelligence collection and analysis infrastructure idling while Brennan plays his egomaniacal games.

 

“Do the right thing. Bring Brennan back out of the shadows and put him to pasture. Let professionals do the job.”

I heard from friends that some of my articles had been posted on the media board inside headquarters. A shrewish comment on the BigPeace website was clearly from a classmate, now a high level officer in management. While not quite notorious, I definitely had ruffled feathers, and was not appreciated. 

In an article published in BigPeace in May 2011, I said, “The CIA leadership now is more political than ever. Never in its history has a pure political hack been in charge, before now. Never has an administration been so enamored of lying and hiding its true foreign policies behind covert action.

“The Libyan operation has all the makings of a disaster for the CIA.

“The disaster inflicted on the Agency by the Kennedys [at the Bay of Pigs] began a cycle of degeneration that endured until 9/11…The CIA’s refurbished reputation, as a result of GWOT successes, is now in jeopardy in Libya.

“Of course, the CIA will not refuse orders from Obama’s office to carry out covert action in Libya. But for anyone who understands the Bay of Pigs debacle, the political fallout, and the damage inflicted on the CIA, it is only right that we should fear the same damage and downward spiral from the upcoming Obama/Hillary Libyan covert action.”

When my first article was published in 2009 attacking the regime’s aggressive attempts to prosecute CIA officers who had been involved in the Bush administration’s aggressive interrogation work, many asked me why other CIA veterans were not speaking out. The regime’s partisan targeting of the intelligence bureaucracy was unprecedented. Before Holder’s efforts were checked, it appeared that he intended to punish CIA officers for carrying out exhaustively coordinated and legally authorized activities in the Global War on Terror.

My answer then, as now, is “They are terrified. Staff officers are terrified that they will lose their jobs. They are terrified that they will lose their clearances. Retirees are terrified they’ll lose their pensions.” The business of intelligence is not clean and tidy. A vindictive reading of the background of virtually any CIA officer involved in field work during the war on terror would uncover incidents or actions that could be spun as administrative, or worse, misdeeds.

Every operations officer knows this. All of them, even retired ops officers, are used to living under a microscope with every action, word or deed spotlighted. Holding a top secret clearance is useful for lucrative post-retirement contracting. Cleared personnel enjoy a premium pay scale for the same work as non-cleared personnel. The thought of losing one’s clearance is terrifying. Just the financial damage alone could be hundreds of thousands of dollars over a career. The clearance/security process can be the ultimate in political vetting, if it were to fall into the hands of unscrupulous politicians. Now it has.  

The clandestine personnel security system is virtually impervious to oversight. Decisions are made by bureaucrats, much like the IRS, the DOJ, and other regime offices, which we see now are all too willing to please their PC-Prog masters. The big difference from the IRS is that everything the CIA does is cloaked to outside view due to national security. Their decisions are not appealable. They don’t have to explain.

Invisible standards are imminently flexible. When a contractor is purged by the security apparatus, his belongings are gathered up overnight, his name tag removed from his cubicle, and he is never heard from again. None of the survivors dare to even utter his name. All are intimidated. All are terrified of losing their paycheck and career. If you doubt it, see how Director Petraeus was purged as soon as he stepped out of line on Benghazi. 

Into this environment I stumbled again in 2011, against my better judgment. I had written extensively, including a scorching book, Willing Accomplices, about the PC-Prog, anti-American background of Obama, his handlers, and his minions. But when an intelligence contracting company made me a monetary offer I could not refuse, I bit my tongue, and accepted a job in the belly of the beast.

At the time, I had a second book in draft, Obliterating Exceptionalism. It detailed very clearly the Obama administration’s misdeeds from 2008 to 2011. It was based on columns that I’d published during that time frame. Many of the columns were about Hillary’s Arab Spring, their Libyan debacle, the war on terror, and John Brennan—none were complimentary.

Following the rules, soon after settling in, I requested permission, as required, for an “outside activity,” speaking to the media about Willing Accomplices. The book’s contents had been cleared by the Publication Review Board (PRB) years before, and there was no classified information in it. At the same time, Panetta and his public relations crew were gallivanting with the PC-Progs of the media and Hollywood. They seemed to give them free rein in the building, and revealed extensive details on the Osama bin Laden operation, information which had been protected by the highest level of security classification. PC-Prog friends of Obama in Hollywood and the media were cool and classified information didn’t matter.

My request was summarily denied, after going through six or eight layers of management. The reply from security added something that was unheard of, however. Attached to the denial were several documents that laid out what seemed to be a new policy. At least, I don’t remember ever hearing about it before. The security officers advised me that not only was my outside activity request scrutinized for the potential to reveal classified information, but also for “appropriateness.”

It’s important to note here that government employees are prohibited by the Hatch Act from political speech or activities in public. It’s pretty much a bargain with the devil they make for job security and a guaranteed pension. But government contractors are not subject to the Hatch Act, outside of the workplace.

Appropriateness? What does that mean? Appropriate to whom? I was soon to find out.

I immediately began searching for a new job. But the salary differential was too much for my wife to accept. The offers I got didn’t match the rate I was earning. If Mamma’s not happy, nobody is. I kept going in every day, and kept searching for another job. Finally, I got a fantastic job interview—managing a training department in an international corporation in Switzerland. They flew me over (after I recieved approval for the outside activity request) for a full-day of meetings with the entire corporate group the same week that John Brennan became the DCIA. 

On my return, the wait for word from Switzerland dragged on longer than expected. I knew that working under Brennan would be unconscionable. I decided that I’d rather sell cars than defile my conscience.

The phone call summoning me to discuss my outside activities was not a surprise. A mere two weeks after Brennan’s arrival, I was called on the carpet. The discussion with the nice lady made clear that they’d been monitoring and inspecting my personal email, my comments on political blogs, my recently published books (one political, and one on the secrets to avoiding colds and flu), and pretty much everything about my personal life since 2001.

Just as the IRS demanded Facebook access, emails, and other personal details from Tea Party activists for political purposes, the nice lady ended the hour and a half discussion with a request to turn over my personal computer to her. Having nothing to hide, I said sure. On the way home, though, it suddenly hit me. My entire life is in that computer—three books, dozens of articles, hundreds of research projects, finished and draft articles and book ideas, my entire executive recruiting business—clients, candidates, and profiles of both—my business and personal financials going back 15 years, my family’s Christmas letters, my personal correspondence with friends and family, my email archive of 15 years or more, every picture I’ve taken in the last 15 years, and much, much more.

And that was when I decided, like Roberto Duran against Sugar Ray Leonard, “No mas.” No more. Screw the salary differential. Screw the nice lady. This was a political witch-hunt. I wasn’t gonna take it any more.

The first thing I did when I got home was to call the best lawyer in town. The one who handles every high level issue having to do with the CIA and personnel. The first thing he said was, “Don’t ever give the government your computer. They’ll never give it back. And they’ll search it forever.” I called the nice lady and told her that I’d changed my mind.

The next thing I did was tell the lawyer that I wanted nothing more to do with this game. I felt dirty, cheap, violated, used, and compromised. I did not call the nice lady back, as she’d asked me to do. My lawyer called to tell her that I would not be coming back again.

Two months after my lonely decision to defy the regime, the Obama/Holder/Hillary regime is finally being questioned about Benghazi, about IRS vendettas, about political hit pieces, about enemies lists, about turning the Constitution on its ear. If there is any justice, those who have perverted the tools designed to protect our Republic in order to advance their own political careers and objectives will face justice. As in all things PC-Progressives do, however, they will continue to lie and pervert our system. May we all survive the coming upheavals.

This regime, once it understood the power of the covert action and investigatory apparatus it controlled, turned on normal Americans. It applied the lessons learned in the GWOT to monitoring its domestic enemies. Total collection, all the time, of all electronic records—cell phones, emails, smart-phones and now tax returns—allows the regime the capability of compiling a complete profile of its enemies—names of contacts, physical locations, message content, interests, photos, and now tax records. What other “confidential and private” government records are added to this “big data” for the uses of the regime?

The sum of all the data available provides them with a holistic overview of an enemy—where he is, what he’s thinking, who he’s talking to, and what his plans are. This overview can be used, as on the battlefield, for targeting. What’s that about drones in America, Master Holder? Have you recused yourself on that one too?

 

Kent Clizbe is a former CIA counter-terrorism operations officer. His two books, Willing Accomplices, and Obliterating Exceptionalism detail the covert influence operation that introduced the anti-American message that became Political Correctness into American culture and the horrendous effects of PC-Progressivism today.