Purges, Dissidents and the Progressive Regime—Something’s Gotta
Give
By Kent Clizbe May
16, 2013
The Obama/Hillary/Holder regime’s
arrogant façade is slowly crumbling. The president and his cabal of handlers
have somehow gone a step too far. There is no accounting for why the media and
some other of the Chicago gang’s public enablers are seemingly turning on 1600
Pennsylvania Avenue. But indeed they are. Maybe the revelations of the
Associated Press (AP) having its communications sucked into the maw of the political
targeters let slip the mask of the “fun-to-hang-out-with-dude” fronting the
regime. The revelation that the “dude” is instead a punk may have shocked those
Politically Correct Progressives who empowered the dude and his handlers.
The pure power the gang commands
is unprecedented in American history. An astute student of American politics,
influence, scandals, and misdeeds would be hard pressed to find a more stunning
abuse of power than what has been revealed of the Obama clique’s misdeeds to
date. And I use “to date” purposefully. It is very likely that there remain
many more shoes to drop as we learn specifics of this regime’s corrupt
political hounding of its “enemies.”
Intimidation and veiled threats
are powerful when wielded by investigators with the power to take your
livelihood, your reputation, your freedom, or your life. I first wrote about
what I called the Obama/Holder Global War on the CIA, in August of 2009 (in Newsmax), when the uniquely unqualified
Leon Panetta was the Director of the CIA. In the next two years, I wrote
several more articles about the politicization of the CIA and the war on
terror. The main target of my analysis was the unctuous John Brennan, at the
time Obama’s toady “Terrorism Czar.”
In February, 2011, I wrote a BigPeace article titled Cairo
Meddler--Czar Brennan Needs to Go. “This
massive cluster-failure of a foreign policy looks like an amateur operation,
run by a wannabe operator. The one personality in the Obama administration that
fits that description is John Brennan.
“Egypt
today is no place for a ‘semester abroad expert’ political analyst to be
allowed free rein. Obama, fire John Brennan today. Let the DNI that you and
your party craved do his work. You have a huge intelligence collection and
analysis infrastructure idling while Brennan plays his egomaniacal games.
“Do the right thing. Bring Brennan back out of the shadows and put
him to pasture. Let professionals do the job.”
I heard from friends that some of
my articles had been posted on the media board inside headquarters. A shrewish
comment on the BigPeace website was clearly from a classmate, now a high level
officer in management. While not quite notorious, I definitely had ruffled
feathers, and was not appreciated.
In an article published in
BigPeace in May 2011, I said, “The CIA leadership now is more
political than ever. Never in its history has a pure political hack been in
charge, before now. Never has an administration been so enamored of lying and
hiding its true foreign policies behind covert action.
“The Libyan operation has all the makings of a disaster for the CIA.
“The disaster inflicted on the Agency by the Kennedys [at the Bay
of Pigs] began a cycle of degeneration that endured until 9/11…The CIA’s
refurbished reputation, as a result of GWOT successes, is now in jeopardy in
Libya.
“Of course, the CIA will not refuse orders from Obama’s office to
carry out covert action in Libya. But for anyone who understands the Bay of
Pigs debacle, the political fallout, and the damage inflicted on the CIA, it is
only right that we should fear the same damage and downward spiral from the
upcoming Obama/Hillary Libyan covert action.”
When my first article was
published in 2009 attacking the regime’s aggressive attempts to prosecute CIA
officers who had been involved in the Bush administration’s aggressive
interrogation work, many asked me why other CIA veterans were not speaking out.
The regime’s partisan targeting of the intelligence bureaucracy was
unprecedented. Before Holder’s efforts were checked, it appeared that he
intended to punish CIA officers for carrying out exhaustively coordinated and
legally authorized activities in the Global War on Terror.
My answer then, as now, is “They
are terrified. Staff officers are terrified that they will lose their jobs.
They are terrified that they will lose their clearances. Retirees are terrified
they’ll lose their pensions.” The business of intelligence is not clean and
tidy. A vindictive reading of the background of virtually any CIA officer
involved in field work during the war on terror would uncover incidents or
actions that could be spun as administrative, or worse, misdeeds.
Every operations officer knows
this. All of them, even retired ops officers, are used to living under a
microscope with every action, word or deed spotlighted. Holding a top secret
clearance is useful for lucrative post-retirement contracting. Cleared
personnel enjoy a premium pay scale for the same work as non-cleared personnel.
The thought of losing one’s clearance is terrifying. Just the financial damage
alone could be hundreds of thousands of dollars over a career. The
clearance/security process can be the ultimate in political vetting, if it were
to fall into the hands of unscrupulous politicians. Now it has.
The clandestine personnel security
system is virtually impervious to oversight. Decisions are made by bureaucrats,
much like the IRS, the DOJ, and other regime offices, which we see now are all
too willing to please their PC-Prog masters. The big difference from the IRS is
that everything the CIA does is cloaked to outside view due to national
security. Their decisions are not appealable. They don’t have to explain.
Invisible standards are imminently
flexible. When a contractor is purged by the security apparatus, his belongings
are gathered up overnight, his name tag removed from his cubicle, and he is
never heard from again. None of the survivors dare to even utter his name. All
are intimidated. All are terrified of losing their paycheck and career. If you
doubt it, see how Director Petraeus was purged as soon as he stepped out of
line on Benghazi.
Into this environment I stumbled
again in 2011, against my better judgment. I had written extensively, including
a scorching book, Willing Accomplices, about the PC-Prog, anti-American
background of Obama, his handlers, and his minions. But when an intelligence
contracting company made me a monetary offer I could not refuse, I bit my
tongue, and accepted a job in the belly of the beast.
At the time, I had a second book
in draft, Obliterating Exceptionalism. It detailed
very clearly the Obama administration’s misdeeds from 2008 to 2011. It was
based on columns that I’d published during that time frame. Many of the columns
were about Hillary’s Arab Spring, their Libyan debacle, the war on terror, and
John Brennan—none were complimentary.
Following the rules, soon after
settling in, I requested permission, as required, for an “outside activity,”
speaking to the media about Willing Accomplices. The book’s contents had been
cleared by the Publication Review Board (PRB) years before, and there was no
classified information in it. At the same time, Panetta and his public
relations crew were gallivanting with the PC-Progs of the media and Hollywood.
They seemed to give them free rein in the building, and revealed extensive
details on the Osama bin Laden operation, information which had been protected
by the highest level of security classification. PC-Prog friends of Obama in
Hollywood and the media were cool and classified information didn’t matter.
My request was summarily denied,
after going through six or eight layers of management. The reply from security
added something that was unheard of, however. Attached to the denial were
several documents that laid out what seemed to be a new policy. At least, I
don’t remember ever hearing about it before. The security officers advised me
that not only was my outside activity request scrutinized for the potential to
reveal classified information, but also for “appropriateness.”
It’s important to note here that
government employees are prohibited by the Hatch Act from political speech or
activities in public. It’s pretty much a bargain with the devil they make for
job security and a guaranteed pension. But government contractors are not
subject to the Hatch Act, outside of the workplace.
Appropriateness? What does that
mean? Appropriate to whom? I was soon to find out.
I immediately began searching for
a new job. But the salary differential was too much for my wife to accept. The
offers I got didn’t match the rate I was earning. If Mamma’s not happy, nobody
is. I kept going in every day, and kept searching for another job. Finally, I
got a fantastic job interview—managing a training department in an
international corporation in Switzerland. They flew me over (after I recieved
approval for the outside activity request) for a full-day of meetings with the entire
corporate group the same week that John Brennan became the DCIA.
On my return, the wait for word
from Switzerland dragged on longer than expected. I knew that working under Brennan
would be unconscionable. I decided that I’d rather sell cars than defile my
conscience.
The phone call summoning me to
discuss my outside activities was not a surprise. A mere two weeks after
Brennan’s arrival, I was called on the carpet. The discussion with the nice
lady made clear that they’d been monitoring and inspecting my personal email, my
comments on political blogs, my recently published books (one political, and
one on the secrets to avoiding colds and flu), and pretty
much everything about my personal life since 2001.
Just as the IRS demanded Facebook
access, emails, and other personal details from Tea Party activists for political
purposes, the nice lady ended the hour and a half discussion with a request to turn
over my personal computer to her. Having nothing to hide, I said sure. On the
way home, though, it suddenly hit me. My entire life is in that computer—three
books, dozens of articles, hundreds of research projects, finished and draft articles
and book ideas, my entire executive recruiting business—clients, candidates, and
profiles of both—my business and personal financials going back 15 years, my
family’s Christmas letters, my personal correspondence with friends and family,
my email archive of 15 years or more, every picture I’ve taken in the last 15
years, and much, much more.
And that was when I decided, like Roberto
Duran against Sugar Ray Leonard, “No mas.” No more. Screw the salary differential.
Screw the nice lady. This was a political witch-hunt. I wasn’t gonna take it
any more.
The first thing I did when I got
home was to call the best lawyer in town. The one who handles every high level
issue having to do with the CIA and personnel. The first thing he said was,
“Don’t ever give the government your computer. They’ll never give it back. And
they’ll search it forever.” I called the nice lady and told her that I’d
changed my mind.
The next thing I did was tell the
lawyer that I wanted nothing more to do with this game. I felt dirty, cheap,
violated, used, and compromised. I did not call the nice lady back, as she’d
asked me to do. My lawyer called to tell her that I would not be coming back
again.
Two months after my lonely
decision to defy the regime, the Obama/Holder/Hillary regime is finally being
questioned about Benghazi, about IRS vendettas, about political hit pieces,
about enemies lists, about turning the Constitution on its ear. If there is any
justice, those who have perverted the tools designed to protect our Republic in
order to advance their own political careers and objectives will face justice.
As in all things PC-Progressives do, however, they will continue to lie and
pervert our system. May we all survive the coming upheavals.
This regime, once it understood
the power of the covert action and investigatory apparatus it controlled,
turned on normal Americans. It applied the lessons learned in the GWOT to
monitoring its domestic enemies. Total collection, all the time, of all electronic
records—cell phones, emails, smart-phones and now tax returns—allows the regime
the capability of compiling a complete profile of its enemies—names of
contacts, physical locations, message content, interests, photos, and now tax
records. What other “confidential and private” government records are added to
this “big data” for the uses of the regime?
The sum of all the data available
provides them with a holistic overview of an enemy—where he is, what he’s
thinking, who he’s talking to, and what his plans are. This overview can be
used, as on the battlefield, for targeting. What’s that about drones in
America, Master Holder? Have you recused yourself on that one too?
Kent
Clizbe is a former CIA counter-terrorism operations officer. His two
books, Willing Accomplices, and Obliterating Exceptionalism detail the covert influence
operation that introduced the anti-American message that became Political
Correctness into American culture and the horrendous effects of
PC-Progressivism today.
No comments:
Post a Comment